Light as a biological stimulus,
the instrument of modern precision medicine
The light emitted by lasers can cut, denature, or gently stimulate retinal tissue cells. A range of light and tissue parameters influence the final clinical results. Nevertheless, two of these parameters are key in defining the light-tissue interaction mode; these must be precisely controlled: the irradiance (or power density) and the pulse duration.
Laser-Tissue Interaction
Light–tissue interaction describes how incident light is absorbed, scattered, or transmitted by biological tissue, and how incoming energy is converted into chemical, thermal, or mechanical effects in the cells and extracellular matrix. In the retina, these interactions can range from gentle stimulation to irreversible damage. Light–tissue and laser–tissue interactions are often used interchangeably. However, the term laser–tissue interaction is preferred, as laser technology reliably delivers light with the required irradiance and pulse duration to achieve all possible interaction modes.
Parameters such as wavelength, spot size, and pulse repetition rate are important because they shape the details of the response, but they do so within a given interaction mode. The mode itself is primarily set by the power delivered per unit area and the exposure time. Together, these two define the fluence or radiant exposure, expressed in J/cm².1
Across the full range of irradiance and exposure time, four interaction modes are described: photochemical, photothermal, photoablative, and photodisruptive.1
The Map that Sets Laser Techniques Apart
Laser–tissue interactions can be mapped on a graph defined by power density and exposure time. This chart positions ten published device settings based on their reported parameters, in accordance with the Boulnois diagram.
Zone boundaries as presented by Boulnois (1986).1 Circles indicate approximate laser parameters, and the dashed diagonals identify constant pulse radiant exposure (fluence). Most laser–tissue interactions of interest occur between 1 and 1000 J/cm². Markers show the irradiation settings of published devices; the geometric mean of the disclosed range of parameters is considered. For representation purposes, the wavelength weighting function is used to normalize the laser parameters for the different applications.
- Light-tissue interactions are sorted into four different modes.
- Dosimetry remains crucial to obtain the expected therapeutic result.
- Safety margins are ranges relative to the intended clinical objective.
- Oculox aspires to preventive retinal treatment.
- Takes advantage of two low-irradiance interaction modes.
- Doses stimulate tissue recovery while excluding iatrogenic lesions.
- Safety margins comply with the preventive treatment mode.
Four modes for a broad spectrum of clinical outcomes
Every laser-tissue interaction falls in one of four physical modes; however, a broad spectrum of clinical outcomes arises from those basic modes. Clinical practice turned these four modes into dozens of named techniques.
In clinical practice, an additional parameter becomes crucial: total fluence or dose, which identifies the total amount of laser energy administered to the target tissues.
The spectrum of clinical outcomes has driven ophthalmology to develop a range of specifically named techniques to identify sets of irradiation parameters, each carrying its own acronym.
Each acronym marks a specific clinical result, a scientific innovation, or a commercial trademark.2
Different Methods, Same Therapeutic Principle
Photothermal and Photobiological stimulations are based on the concept of hormesis: applying 'just enough' power to trigger the cell's endogenous defence and repair mechanisms without causing damage. The goal is to restore homeostasis so that retinal tissue can return to physiological equilibrium and better regulate cellular activities.
Photobiological Stimulation
When light is delivered at low power density (milliwatts per cm²), the photons that reach the Cytochrome c Oxidase (CCO) promote the dissociation of inhibitory nitric oxide (NO) from the enzyme. This photochemical reaction stimulates cellular metabolism. CCO electron transport accelerates, boosting ATP production and triggering mild, beneficial reactive oxygen species (ROS) spikes. These ROS activate transcription factors that promote antioxidant production, anti-inflammatory cytokines, and tissue repair. Photobiological stimulation relies on a continuous, slow flow of photons. Excessive ROS would induce severe oxidative stress and cell death.11
Cellular Self-Repair · Retinal Energy ActivationPhotothermal Stimulation
At higher power densities, the energy delivered by photons is absorbed and accumulated by endogenous chromophores (mainly the dense melanin layers). Photon energy is dissipated as heat, causing subthreshold protein unfolding and activating Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs).14 This stabilises proteins, enhances metabolic activity, modulates cytokine release, and modifies vascular permeability. The tissue temperature rise is kept below the threshold for protein denaturation. To promote selective local heating, the laser operates in pulsed mode, where brief irradiation periods are interspersed with longer intervals that permit thermal relaxation.2,6,10
Controlled Heating · Heat Shock Proteins · Tissue Self-RepairFor What Photostimulation Has Been Used
Both photostimulation modes have been long studied in clinical research. Medical devices for both thermal and biological stimulations are commercially available for different specific retinal conditions. The cases below show a few examples*.
Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Current retinaSEES FocusDry AMD is the most prevalent form of Age-related Macular Degeneration, accounting for approximately 85–90% of cases. It typically progresses silently over many years, driven by oxidative stress and degeneration of the retinal pigment epithelium, ultimately resulting in geographic atrophy and irreversible loss of photoreceptors.13 Therapeutic options remain limited. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is increasingly employed in dry AMD with the objective of activating the retina's intrinsic repair and protective mechanisms. Multiple medical devices are already available, and clinical evidence on PBM in dry AMD is being accumulated through ongoing and planned studies.12
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)
In chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, subthreshold laser is used to target the retinal pigment epithelium with repetitive, sublethal thermal pulses kept below the threshold for visible damage. The stimulus activates RPE stress-response pathways and restores its metabolic and pump function, promoting resorption of subretinal fluid without a coagulative burn or foveal scar. Studies reported significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity and reduced central macular, central retinal, and choroidal thicknesses. Reduction in subretinal fluid did not reach statistical significance.9
Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME)
In diabetic macular oedema, pulsed lasers are used to treat the retinal pigment epithelium without a visible burn endpoint, avoiding iatrogenic scarring or photocoagulation. The lack of a visible lesion allows treatment right up to the fovea. Research using a 577-nm pulsed laser produced a modest but significant gain in visual acuity and reduced macular thickening. The reduction in central retinal thickness did not reach statistical significance. The treatment is suggested to be a complement to anti-VEGF injections, which remain the standard treatment.7
*The conditions listed above indicate clinical contexts in which photothermal and photobiological regimes have been studied. They provide only a brief and non-exhaustive overview of potential applications. They should not be interpreted as a statement of the intended purpose of any Oculox device, nor as specific information about its current clinical status. The intended purpose of Oculox's devices is defined exclusively in their regulatory notice.
Two Photostimulation Modes in a Single Device
retinaSEES brings both stimulation regimes, photothermal and photobiological, together in a single automated, non-invasive platform. Each mode is delivered as a controlled, subthreshold energy dose designed to stimulate the retina without damaging it. The current clinical focus is the treatment of intermediate dry AMD.
retinaSEES uses a near-infrared (NIR) laser to reach the deeper retinal layers, and a Maxwellian optical design to deliver the therapeutic beam to the retina independently of pupil size. The retinaSEES treatment workflow is designed to fit routine ophthalmic practice.
Discover retinaSEESQuestions about Photostimulation
Explore photostimulation with retinaSEES
Whether you are a researcher, clinician, or institution interested in our research platform, we would like to hear from you.
Scientific References
References include the foundational work on laser-tissue interaction modes, the published device settings plotted on the map, and peer-reviewed clinical studies of the techniques described.
1. Boulnois JL. Photophysical processes in recent medical laser developments: a review. Lasers Med Sci. 1986;1(1):47–66.
2. von der Burchard C, Miura Y, Stanzel B, et al. Regenerative retinal laser and light therapies (RELITE): proposal of a new nomenclature, categorization, and trial reporting standard. Lasers Surg Med. 2024;56(8):693–708. doi:10.1002/lsm.23833
3. Wu CM, Chang TC. Selective laser trabeculoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2023;63(4):23–32. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000483
4. Zheng M, Paulus YM. Recent innovations in retinal laser therapy. Photonics. 2025;12(2):156. doi:10.3390/photonics12020156
5. Salman AG. Pascal laser versus conventional laser for treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011;25(2):175–179. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.01.006
6. Sivaprasad S, Elagouz M, McHugh D, Shona O, Dorin G. Micropulsed diode laser therapy: evolution and clinical applications. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010;55(6):516–530. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.02.005
7. Frizziero L, Calciati A, Torresin T, et al. Diabetic macular edema treated with 577-nm subthreshold micropulse laser: a real-life, long-term study. J Pers Med. 2021;11(5):405. doi:10.3390/jpm11050405
8. Rogers AH, Reichel E. Transpupillary thermotherapy of subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12(3):212–215. doi:10.1097/00055735-200106000-00012
9. Luo W, He Y. Efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2026;13:1785787. doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1785787
10. Sramek C, Mackanos M, Spitler R, Leung LS, Nomoto H, Contag CH, Palanker D. Non-damaging retinal phototherapy: dynamic range of heat shock protein expression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1780–1787. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5917
11. Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and mitochondrial redox signaling in photobiomodulation. Photochem Photobiol. 2018;94(2):199–212. doi:10.1111/php.12864
12. Boyer D, Hu A, Warrow D, et al. LIGHTSITE III: 13-month efficacy and safety evaluation of multiwavelength photobiomodulation in nonexudative (dry) age-related macular degeneration using the LumiThera Valeda light delivery system. Retina. 2024;44(3):487–497. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003980
13. Fleckenstein M, Keenan TDL, Guymer RH, et al. Age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):31. doi:10.1038/s41572-021-00265-2
14. De Cillàs S, Vezzola D, Farruggio S, et al. The subthreshold micropulse laser treatment of the retina restores the oxidant/antioxidant balance and counteracts programmed forms of cell death in the mice eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(4). doi:10.1111/aos.13995